top of page

New FTX Bombshell Report Exposes Intentional Fraud, Conspiracy.

FTX CEO John J. Ray III. Image courtesy, Reuters.

WILMINGTON, DE – In a stunning turn of events, FTX CEO John J. Ray III and his restructuring team have unleashed a bombshell report that has sent shockwaves reverberating through the financial world. The report delves deep into the dark underbelly of alleged criminal activities and fraud at the now-defunct crypto exchange, FTX, and its affiliated hedge fund, Alameda Research. What has been unearthed is a complex web of deceit that far surpasses initial estimations.

Perhaps the most damning revelation within the report is the disclosure that FTX executives were fully aware as early as August 2022 that a staggering $8 billion in customer funds had mysteriously vanished. This revelation stands in stark contradiction to previous statements made by former CEO Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF) and other high-ranking executives, who had reassured stakeholders that the company was on solid ground. Disturbingly, the report goes on to implicate SBF directly in furthering these fraudulent activities, painting a haunting portrait of his alleged complicity.

Adding fuel to the fire of SBF's legal woes is the mention of a pivotal document known as the "Payment Agent Agreement." This document was cunningly devised to present the flow of FTX customer deposits through Alameda Research bank accounts as a deliberate arrangement, rather than an oversight or act of negligence. Astonishingly, this document was intentionally backdated to June 1, 2019, despite being created in April 2021.

Furthermore, the report uncovers a striking detail—SBF's physical signature on the backdated document. This deliberate choice to employ a physical signature instead of using an electronic method like DocuSign, which SBF commonly utilized, suggests a conscious effort to evade the generation of metadata that would have exposed the document as a recent fabrication. Such actions hint at a wider conspiracy aimed at perpetrating and concealing the extensive fraud scheme.

While it remains uncertain whether the evidence presented in this groundbreaking report will be admitted as valid evidence in SBF's upcoming criminal trial on October 2, it seems highly probable that much of it will undergo intense scrutiny. As legal proceedings gradually unfold, the revelations contained within this report are poised to have far-reaching implications. However, the extent of these consequences is still shrouded in uncertainty, leaving us to ponder the true extent of the damage caused by this elaborate web of fraud.


bottom of page